Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 04:04

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trevor Penning: The things I do well fit better at guard - NBC Sports
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
How can someone effectively handle a targeted individual?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What is Rejuran treatment, and how does it benefit the skin?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
‘I feel like I’ve been lied to’: When a measles outbreak hits home - The Spokesman-Review
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Will Canada and Mexico become stronger partners in the Trump era?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Instagram for iPad is reportedly coming soon; here’s when to expect it - 9to5Mac
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.